Get to Work

Common Phrase

There is an assumption that everyone “knows” the common acronyms and sayings in the world.  But, use one of those “known” sayings, the “assumes” acronym: making an “ass of you and me”.  That was me when I was twenty, and on the staff of a US Congressman in Cincinnati.  He was famous for his incredibly bad temper, a Marine who often indulged in alcohol, and abuse of his staff.  As a young Democratic “operative”, it was a Cincinnati “rite of passage” to work for him and absorb his tirades.  I got fired seven times in one summer, the second least on the Cincinnati staff.  And one of the times I got in “big trouble”, was when I ignored the letters, “ASAP” on the top of a memo from him. 

I had no clue what “ASAP” meant, so I ignored it and rotated the task to the bottom of my “to do list”.  There was a lot going.  I was responsible for scheduling minute-to-minute all of the events and duties the Congressman “had” to do while back in Cincinnati.  But, he soon roared back to me, and  taught in a profanity laced, Marine Drill Instructor form, that an “ASAP” from him meant, RIGHT NOW (not just As Soon As Possible).

Just Plain Lying

The next year I was a first-year teacher.  My principal was a guy named Pete Nix.  He seemed “old” to me, though looking back he was only forty-two.  And he was definitely intimidating, another Marine, a wrestling coach, and a “man of the South”.  He was the perfect mentor to a “long haired” twenty-one year old, fresh out of Denison University.   I don’t ever remember him yelling or being abusive; he was the kind of man who didn’t need to.  A shake of his head, drawling “I wish you hadn’t done that”, was enough to correct almost any flaw.  And of course, if you were a student, the paddle he kept behind his deck, well-worn from use on the “seats” of high school student’s bodies, was always a threat.

Pete knew all of the common “sayings” plus dozens of others from his Southern upbringing.  One he introduced me to still has validity today:  “Figures lie, and liars figure”.  In education there is a lot of “data” gathered; attendance, grades, standardized test scores, teacher recommendations.  But that “data” is all subject to manipulation, emphasizing one over the other.  Pete was a master at  cutting to the chase, and throwing out the “fluff”.  If you wanted permission to do something, you needed to make a solid, clear, and precise argument.  Otherwise, he’d tell you, “You’re just figurin’”.  And you knew what that meant – you never wanted him to think you were manipulating  either the data, or him.  That was just plain “lying”.

Today’s Headline

So one of the banners on this morning’s political news, was the results of a Wall Street Journal poll.  This headline summed it up best: “6 in 10 voters view Democrats Negatively:  WSJ Poll” (The Hill).    And various commentators bemoaned “what has become” of Democrats?  How could Trump, with all of his baggage of confusing tariffs, cuts to Medicaid and Medicare, starving Palestinians, a Defense Secretary leaking classified information, and, of course, the EPSTEIN FILES; still have more of America’s confidence than the Democrats?

What’s wrong with the Democrats?   Commentators, left and right, demand that Democrats need a “total rebuild”. And the far-right was convinced that the Democratic Party is going the way of the Whigs and the Federalists into historic oblivion.

There’s another “common phrase”, coined by 19th century author Mark Twain:  “The reports of my death are greatly exaggerated”.  So too, are the reports of the “end” of the Democratic Party.  

More Figures

First of all, remember the source.  The Wall Street Journal is ultimately owned by Rupert Murdock of Fox News fame.  So an “unbiased poll” from them, is as unlikely as Pam Bondi telling you that “there’s nothing to see in the Epstein Files”.   And let’s look at some of the other results of that same poll.   Democrats led Republicans in “Generic Congressional Vote” by three percent.  So while “6 in 10 voters view Democrats Negatively”, the majority would still pick a Democratic Congress; go figure.  And that same poll also finds that the United States, with a Republican President, House, Senate, and Supreme Court; is on the “wrong track”, 55% to 39%.  

Finally, just a reality check.  Democrats lost the Presidency, and the Senate last year.  They went from the empowered party to a party with no power at all.  In addition, the leadership of the Democratic Party is in total flux, as it should be.  Joe Biden is done, Kamala Harris does not appear to be the “heir apparent” anymore, and there will be a marvelous struggle to see who can win the Democratic leadership come 2028.  But that three years away, a lifetime of political changes from today.  Meanwhile, there’s no single place for Democrats to “lead from”, at least until 2026. The Party looks helpless, because it is.

Roaring Back

It wasn’t that different back in 2017.  Democrats were in shock that Trump won (and Hillary lost) and had neither the House nor the Senate.  “The Resistance” then, seemed unable to stop all of Trump’s craziness.  But they came roaring back in 2018, with the House switching to Democratic power, and Nancy Pelosi leading to an even stronger showing in 2020.  It can all happen again.  

MAGA wants a target, to take the pressure off of themselves.  The old “Bernie and OAC” attacks don’t seem to be making headway.  So they want Democrats to look and feel “lost”.  And meanwhile, they are shooting themselves in the foot with all of the current crises, mostly of their own creation.  

Should Democrats worry about a “negative image” in a Wall Street Journal poll?  Sure, they should.  Is it time to panic, to join Elon Musk in a the new “American Party” (like the Whigs joined old Federalists in the Republican Party back in the 1850’s)?  That answer is a strong “NOPE”.  

It is time to start building. First, build momentum to gain four seats in the House and Senate in 2026 to regain the control of the Congress.  Then they can start to take back the power that the current leadership gave over to the President.  And Democrats will find a candidate, in due time, to put back in the White House. We will have remarkable choice of candidates in the 2028 primaries, and we will find a leader who can win. And then we can start rebuilding our government and Nation, with “liberty and justice, for all”.  

So, ignore the “lying and figuring”. Let’s get to work.

It’s About Time

This is a true “Sunday Story”.  No politics today, just some “musings” about time – and it’s on a Sunday!!

Clocks

I think we all have little quirks:  the things we do that, maybe, only make sense to us.  I am a clock setter.  Is the timer on the coffee pot and the timer on the microwave out of sync? I can’t stand it.   So when the power goes out, I am quick to reset everything.  Now, in my favor I think; I don’t have to have them synchronized to the absolute second.  The “half-minute” will do.  

I am definitely the guy who resets the car clocks the first chance after the time changes.  In fact, that’s the first thing the next morning, twice a year, for every clock we have.  That includes the “ornamental” clocks that we don’t even see, “award-plaque” clocks that probably need a new battery, and the fancy watches I seldom wear.  I want the time to be accurate, everywhere I look.  Somehow, on the Jeep, the clock consistently gets five minutes too fast, which, as you probably can tell, makes me crazy.  So I reset that one every few weeks, back to  “real time”.   That way I don’t feel like I’m late for everything!!

The clock on my stopwatch is correct too.  I use it a lot during the track seasons, and I don’t want to have to check my phone during a competition to see what time it is.  Folks will think I’m “texting” in the middle of a vault or a race, not a good look. 

Look Forward

We also have a monthly calendar on the wall of our kitchen, a dry-erase board.  It has room for five weeks, and as soon as I can possibly fit the “next” month on, I put it up.  It’s one more way (besides our sync’d phone calendars) for Jenn and I to be on the “same page”.  But it also gives a visual representation of our commitments.  Sometimes, it just a way to see where the “get-to” days are:  the days when there’s nothing on the schedule, and we can chill.  

But the point for me is to get my head ready for “what’s next”.  Today was that day (I had to squeeze August 24 and 31 in the same box).  There’s all the medical stuff that comes with being old enough for Medicare, and August is the “Birthday Month” for Jenn.  And slipping in on Saturday’s are Cross Country meets, a little bit of back to work for me.  

Parking Lots

When I was a track coach, we went to a lot of track invitationals. Those are all-day affairs, arriving early on a Saturday morning and leaving just before dinner time.  The first “duty” of the team was to establish a camp, where we literally pitched our tent and put all of our equipment.  My first “on site” decision was to say where the camp would go.  And, as all of my coaches, and most of my older athletes realized, we “camped” in the same place every year.

It was usually somewhere on the backstretch of the track, with a good view of the finish line and the field event venues.  In fact, I seldom was in the “camp”.  I was out coaching, prowling the backstretch during the running events, and hanging out at the field areas for their competitions.  But we always had that central spot – our camp – in the same place.  Name a venue:  Heath, Granville, Worthington, Wheeling, Pickerington, Licking Valley, Galion.  You could always find the Watkins boys team – in the same spot.  

So it shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that I park in the same area for places I always go to:  Kroger’s, Doctor’s office, Barber, the Ohio Theatre, the Jesse Owens Track at Ohio State.  That way, when I’m done with whatever errand or event, I can come right back out to the car, which, of course, is right where it’s supposed to be.

Old Age?

Some might say that’s old age.  Nothing worse than that “sad elderly man” wandering the parking lot looking for his car.  But, to be honest, I’ve been doing this since I learned how to drive.  It just seems easier, one less thing to remember.  (By the way, it drives Jenn crazy.  Her goal is to “park as close as you can”, even if it takes an extra five minutes to find the spot.  So my pulling up two rows over and fifteen cars out to an empty spot always generates a sigh.  “Are you saving the good spots for ‘old people’?  We ARE old people!!!”).

I know where my car is parked.  And I know what time it is, and, good or bad, what’s happening tomorrow.  It’s all about time – and at least I get the “correct” information.  The future is never certain, but at least the “map” for how it’s supposed to be, is.  

That’s one less thing to worry about.

The Sunday Story Series

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

American Narcissism

Narcissism – excessive interest in oneself  (Mariam-Webster)

  • In Gaza, over a million Palestinians are at risk of starvation.  Already, folks are dying from lack of food.  The press describes it in the most basic terms:  even their own employees working in Gaza, with jobs and incomes, cannot guarantee their own food needs.  One Palestinian puts the daily search for food bluntly:  “We might get killed, but we have to get food”. (BBC)
  • At the Thailand/Cambodia border a growing dispute killed at least sixteen, and tens of thousands are “displaced”;  running from the fighting. (BBC)
  • In Nairobi, Kenya, clashes between protestors demanding police be held accountable for deaths and injuries, and hired thugs, continue in the streets. (Washington Post)
  • Climate changes continue, as northern Finland and Alaska both experience unprecedented heat waves.  The Finnish region of Lapland topped eighty-five degrees (Fahrenheit).  (BBC)

America First

World War I taught Americans a stark lesson:  Americans dying in foreign fields was difficult to take.  Over 53,000 Americans died in combat during the brief twenty-month period the US was involved.  Even more, over 63,000 died from non-combat causes. Many were lost  to the “Spanish Flu”, a pandemic that actually originated at Fort Riley, Kansas and spread, with the soldiers, world-wide.

The immediate lesson America learned was:  don’t be involved in world affairs.  George Washington’s farewell address was often invoked:  “It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world…”.  And so the America of the 1920’s avoided involvement with the rest of the world, including the League of Nations, proposed to end wars by our own President, Woodrow Wilson.  Instead, we became an insular nation, hiding behind our “impregnable” oceans, and a stiff wall of import tariffs.

Extremism

But, like the Spanish Flu, the world was still able to seep through to American life.  When the United States banned the production of alcohol for pleasurable consumption, the borders became opportunities for profit.  Canada, Mexico, the Caribbean; all became channels for high-risk, high-profit smuggling.  The first big rise of organized crime in the United States came from supplying Americans what they wanted:  bootleggers selling illegal booze.  

And when the US economy collapsed in the Great Depression, it took little time for that economic disaster to spread worldwide.  Joblessness that peaked in the United States at 25%, went as high as 33% in other industrial nations.  The existing governments failed to prevent or resolve the economic issues. That led to the growth of political extremism on both sides of the spectrum.  Communism became more popular, as did Fascism.  And the United States did little to stop extremism in the world.  In fact, those same views found popularity in the US itself. 

Pax Americana

Ultimately the world reached out across the “impregnable” oceans, and the US found itself in World War II.  The authoritarian threats came from both directions:  the Japanese military dictatorship to the West, and Nazism and Fascism to the East.  America could have led the world towards peace after World War I.  That was the intent of the much-maligned Wilson Administration.  But rising isolationism, and Wilson’s own physical infirmity, allowed the US to turn away from leadership.  

There was bipartisan belief that this should not happen again after World War II.  And so the United Nations was “born” in San Francisco, with the specific intent of keeping the world from another global conflict.  And the United States developed and led treaty organizations; NATO, CENTO, SEATO and the rest, to hold firm to the idea that strength could bring peace.  For over seventy years, world conflagration was avoided.

Narcissists

But now the United States has turned inward again.   The policy of the US Government is based once again on the principle of “America First”. The tariff wall is going up, and the President talks about the “strength” of our oceanic borders.  In addition, America, “the shining city on the hill” of Ronald Reagan, is closing its doors to the “huddled masses yearning to be free”.  The Statue of Liberty now represents the “lamp” lifted to reveal a “golden door” bolted shut.

We Americans are more worried about the “Epstein Files” and the duel between Trump and Fed Chairman Powell, or re-litigating the 2016 election; then we are about starvation in Gaza, or climate change, or potential wars throughout the world.  Our “important” issues are ones of politics, culture and religion, not the needs of those throughout the globe.  We are more worried about ourselves than the world we live in.

We are narcissists; only interested in ourselves: just like our nation’s leaders today.

Promises Broken

Sit on the Files

I wrote an essay the other day about the Trump Administration’s efforts to distract from the Epstein “crisis” (Disturbance in the Force).  There’s not a whole lot more to say about the “meat” of the issue, other than a Wall Street Journal article that Attorney General Pam Bondi notified President Trump that his name was in the “Epstein Files”.  Soon after; Bondi, FBI Director Patel, and FBI Deputy Director and noted conspiracy theorist Dan Bongino issued a two page memo.  They said there was nothing to release.  That report lit MAGA-world on fire, a fire that has yet to be controlled.  The “Epstein Files” story, as the newspaper’s would say, “has legs”.

Everyone in MAGA-world got dragged into this.  Speaker Mike Johnson literally sent the House of Representatives home, rather than have votes on releasing the files.  And when a reporter asked Johnson if he was “afraid” of the Epstein issue, Johnson forcefully responded, and deflected.  He claimed that this was all the Biden Administration’s fault.  He said they had the information and “sat on it”, and Johnson wasn’t going to get mired in “their” mistake.

Mid-Year Exam

So let’s look at what the Department of Justice (DOJ) does, and the recent history of “controversial” cases.  The “traditional” job of Justice, is to investigate and prosecute.  For generations, the Department did NOT “talk” about cases.  As we learned through the Mueller and later Jack Smith; the traditional DOJ “speaks” through indictments and charges filed in Court. In fact, there’s a term for that:  a “speaking indictment”.  

But the current issue begins with the “great exception” to DOJ practices; made in the middle of the 2016 Presidential election campaign.  You probably remember;   the “Benghazi Hearings” revealed that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was using a private email server.  The controversy was: did the use of that server violate Federal Law, by avoiding public record laws, and risking classified information on a “home” server.

The Trump Campaign used it against Clinton:  where are the emails?  And the FBI did a comprehensive investigation into the Clinton emails, code-named “Mid-Year Exam”.  The investigation culminated in an extended interview of Clinton herself, over the Fourth of July weekend of 2016, just weeks before the Democratic Convention.

This was during the Obama Administration, and Loretta Lynch was the Attorney General.  That was an inherent conflict.  While the FBI investigates crimes, they do not make decisions about charging crimes in court.  That is the job of the prosecutors of the DOJ.  But because of obvious politics and an apparent conflict of interest (Lynch spoke with Bill Clinton when both were on the runway of an airport), there was no clear line of authority.  If the head of DOJ couldn’t make the decision to charge Clinton or not, who would?

Comey

The FBI Director, James Comey, was a former Deputy Attorney General (in the George Bush Administration), and a career prosecutor.  After looking at the investigation’s results, he determined that Clinton did not “show an intent” to violate the laws, a critical factor in bringing criminal charges.  And he took it upon himself to determine that no charges would be filed.

But he went farther than that.  DOJ policy says when an investigation is concluded, and no charges are going to be made, that any announcement is limited to saying, “no charges will be filed”.  But Comey felt the need to go into great detail to explain, that while Clinton didn’t commit a criminal offense, she was careless with classified information.  So while she wasn’t charged, she was “convicted” in the world of public opinion.

No one was satisfied with Comey’s actions.  Democrats pointed to DOJ policy.  Republicans pointed to Comey’s “careless” statement.  And, later, when further investigation was required, Comey announced that the investigation was re-opened, days before the Presidential election.  Many, including this author, believe that Comey’s announcement cost Clinton the Presidency (and the United States the Trump Presidencies).

What did the Department of Justice learn from all of that?  Mueller, Jack Smith, and even John Durham let their indictments and final reports speak for their investigations.  That continued into the Biden Administration, where Attorney General Merrick Garland required a strict adherence to DOJ policies.

Nothing to See

Back to Epstein:  he was arrested and charged (and died) under the first Trump Administration.  When Garland took charge, there were no charges to be made, Epstein was dead.  But there were charges filed, and a conviction gained, against Ghislane Maxwell, Epstein’s procurer.  She’s serving twenty years in Federal prison.  The indictments and the conviction “spoke” for the DOJ.

And that policy was used by conspiracy theorists to attack Biden and later Kamala Harris.  They “must be hiding” the Epstein “black book”: the list of all the participants in his child sex parties and tours.  (While whoever is on that list may well have committed crimes, the statute of limitations for those crimes has likely run out).  But the Garland DOJ had nothing to say: no charges, no statements.

So when Trump won the election, many conspiracy theorists were excited.  Finally the “theorists” were in charge:  Patel and Bongino at the FBI and Bondi leading the DOJ.   But now:  “There’s nothing to see here, move along, move along”.   

Unlike Star Wars, no one is moving along.

Merrick Garland followed the policy of the DOJ – no charges, no further statements.  Now Pam Bondi is trying to do the same.  The problem is – she “promised” the “Epstein Files”, over and over and over and over again.  And now, promises made, promises broken.

Disturbance in the Force

Friday Night Garbage

There is an old Washington tradition, called “Friday Night Garbage”.  It goes like this:  if you have something distasteful, some situation where you need to make a press statement, but you don’t want any attention paid to it; put it out on Friday after five pm.  It won’t make the Nightly News because it’s too late, and besides, no one pays attention to Friday news anyway. There’s too much else to do.  

Perhaps we should now include the entire weekend in the “Friday Night Garbage” routine, at least when it comes to the Trump Administration.  The President is clearly faced by an existential threat, one that non-MAGA Americans really don’t recognize:  the Epstein Files. (And, if you just saw Hamilton, the Musical, like we did for the sixth time, sing “Epstein Files” like the “Reynolds Pamphlet”.   Maybe we need Joe Biden in full King George regalia dancing across the stage handing out file folders).  

Political Physics

How do we know that Epstein is an “existential threat”?  Politics, like physics, has basic laws.  One of those is the law of action/reaction.  The White House “reaction” to the Epstein situation is so extreme, that the “action” of those files must be pretty serious.  So serious in fact, that Donald Trump is willing to risk the support of his most fervent MAGA followers, rather than give them what he promised:  full access to the files.

Here’s a list of “stuff” that’s “hit the fan” since Friday – mostly from the White House:

  •  President Obama accused of treason
  • Senator Adam Schiff accused of mortgage fraud
  •  300,000 pages of Martin Luther King Jr FBI files “dumped” to public
  • Hillary Clinton email investigation now reinvestigated
  • Trump threatens to take away Rosie O’Donnell’s US citizenship
  • NPR and PBS defunded at White House request
  • Trump demands that professional sports teams in Washington and Cleveland change their names back to racial tropes
  • Trump sues Wall Street Journal over Epstein related article for $10 Billion

 (thanks to MSNBC’s Morning Joe for help in categorizing this list).

And besides all of that, the First Amendment battle between the Administration and Harvard University opened up in Court, Stephen Colbert was cancelled by Paramount, and a whole bunch of tariffs were instituted (if you don’t know, check your coffee prices). 

Not Treason

Before we go forward, let’s get one thing clear.   The treason accusation against Obama is based on an “investigation” by Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard.  After five previous investigations, including a bipartisan report by the US Senate intelligence committee, the Mueller investigation, the Durham investigation, and an investigation by the Justice Department Inspector General; Gabbard discovered something “new”.  She determined that the intelligence professionals didn’t agree that Russia “hacked” the US elections.

Of course, that’s not what the intelligence said.  It stated that Russia did hack the Democratic National Committee (the stolen emails on Wikileaks). And it did make a concerted effort to back the Trump candidacy on social media.  While there were attempts by Russia to hack actual voting machines, there was no proof  showing an actual impact on the election outcomes. But Gabbard took that last point, and built a “case” saying that Obama altered the intelligence analysis to go after Trump.  That’s not what the Intelligence analysis said (the famous report that Jim Comey presented to Trump in New York prior to his inauguration).  But Gabbard needed a way back into Trump’s good graces. This was her contribution to distract from Epstein. 

MAGA Universe

Let’s go back to “physics” for just a minute.  We know that far-away planetary bodies are often discovered not by being sighted, but by the reaction their gravitational pulls create on known other bodies in space.  The bigger the reaction, the bigger the “hidden” body.  Politics is often the same.  If a “story” is small, then it gets “thrown out” with Friday night “garbage”.  But if it’s bigger, it takes a lot of other distractions to create political cover.  So how big is the “Epstein Files”?

What we can surmise is that whatever involvement Trump has with Epstein is big enough that it’s worth all of this effort.  And keep in mind:  Democrats like President Bill Clinton, Ambassador Bill Richardson, and Senator George Mitchell are already implicated in Epstein’s sordid activities.  On the surface, that’s something that Trump would blast to the world. But he’s holding back.  

And the “Epstein Files” have been a pillar of the MAGA movement since 2020.  It’s all part of the “Deep State” conspiracy, as well as the connection to the QAnon “Democrat Pedophile” canon.  When Attorney General Bondi said, “There’s nothing here”, it created a “disturbance in the force” of the MAGA universe, that can’t be undone.

Two Know

We may never know.  The one other person (not Trump) with direct knowledge of Trump’s involvement is in Federal custody in Florida, serving twenty years.  Ghislane Maxwell remains silent; probably a smart move considering the uncertainty surrounding Epstein’s death in Federal custody. Attorney General Bondi is sending Trump’s trusted lawyer, Todd Blanche, to have a “talk”, soon.

And it’s not like Democrats are all lined up.  Hunter Biden is ripping off the Biden dropping out band-aid one more time.  That’s one more distraction, though probably not in concert with the White House.  But the one thing you can be sure of:  there’s a “there, there” when it comes to Trump and Epstein. 

 What other possible reason would he have to cover it up?

Time for a Tummy Ache

Corruption

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has a tummy ache.  It’s so bad, his doctor ordered three days of bed rest.  You’d have a tummy ache too: the Prime Minister is supposed to appear at his own corruption trial.  Unlike the United States President, the Prime Minister of Israel can be  criminally tried while in office. 

And, much like the current US President, Netanyahu used the “immediacy” of his office to stave off the trial for years.  Certainly the ongoing “operations” in Gaza against Hamas were a solid excuse.  As a war leader, the normalcy of “routine criminal prosecution” was upended. And the Israeli government was deep in crisis management mode after the Hama’s terrorist assaults of October 7th.   But, it’s been an ongoing question both in Israel and the United States:  is a ceasefire in Gaza based on some mutually agreed set of concessions, or are there no concessions worth the risk of Netanyahu’s conviction and imprisonment for corruption?  

Find Another War

It’s not all about the trial.  Netanyahu is also held hostage by his own coalition of far-right factions, interested in clearing all Palestinian lands for Israeli settlement.  If the coalition falls apart, then, Netanyahu would face general election.  Should he lose and fall out of power, then the corruption trial would accelerate.

Even as the reality of Hama’s demise in Gaza became clear, Israeli operations in the region continued.  The cold, hard fact was that the goal became kill every member of Hamas, even if the rest of the Palestinians in the region had to go too.  Thousands of regular Palestinians have been killed for the “crime” of waiting in a food line.

And, as things wound down in Gaza, Israel launched their attack on another terrorist group, this time in Lebanon and Syria.  The unique tactic of exploding pagers decimated Hezbollah membership, and preceded a full-on military assault.  And when that proved to be a resounding success, Israel moved onto to bombing Iran. Even the United States joined in, taking advantage of Israeli decimation of Iranian air defenses to drop the “bunker busting” bombs from B-2 Bombers on Iranian nuclear facilities.

It looked like a political “trifecta” for Netanyahu:  defeat of Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran.  But the trial loomed over him, a Judaic Justice, Sword of Damocles.  So now Israel is attacking the new Syrian regime, bombing Damascus ostensibly to defend the Druse Syrian minority from persecution.  

Shock in the White House

Even the Trump White House was shocked by that attack, as well as the bombing of a Roman Catholic Church in Gaza.  It took the current Administration almost six months to realize that Russia’s President Putin was “playing them” for time with Ukrainian ceasefire talks.  Now they are recognizing the Netanyahu has his own private agenda as well. 

Some Israelis are taking advantage of the situation:  “striking while the iron is hot”.  And the other major “players” in the Middle East, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Egypt; have their own agendas that align with Israel’s attacks on Iran and its proxies, Hezbollah and Hamas.  They’ve stepped aside from those confrontations, giving Israel full clearance.  And while Israel is already on a war footing, why not take care of “all” the problems?

A Single State Solution

Israel is also busy clearing more Palestinians out of the West Bank, violating existing agreements by building more settlements.  The “two-state” solution, the US backed plan for ultimate Middle East peace that dominated discussion  for almost fifty years, is now as good as gone.  Israelis are creating a single state, Israel, and an occupied territory, the West Bank and Gaza, that will remain under Israeli control.  The US President even wants some “beachfront” in Gaza for a personal luxury hotel.  This “single-state” makes Israel an occupying nation in perpetuity, with all of the negative cultural impacts of subjugating another people.  Israel is becoming a democracy for some, and a military dictatorship for many.

But there is still one essential truth.  Netanyahu faces trial.  Attacks on Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran and now Syria only delayed the inevitable.  I guess when you can’t bomb something, it’s time for a “tummy ache”.    

Night Moves

  • I awoke last night to the sound of thunder
  • How far off, I sat and wondered
  • Started humming a song from 1962
  • Ain’t it funny how the night moves  – Bob Seger, Night Moves

Dogs (of course)

One of the “joys” of dog ownership is companionship.  Our Yellow Lab Atticus is the extreme example of that.  He isn’t happy unless he’s close by.  Like many rescue dogs he has demons, and  Atticus’s is separation anxiety.  If you’re gone, it’s OK, but if you’re here and out of sight, that’s a different story.  He need to see you, to be around you, to be behind you when you turn around, and to make sure he’s “checked in”.

So, not surprisingly, Atticus sleeps with us.  That’s fine.  On cold nights he’s what my Mother would call a “big hot water bottle”.  On warmer nights he takes up his portion of the end of the bed.  But he usually sleeps through the night, and so do we.

So it was unusual that he was up last night, wandering the bedroom about 1:30.  I am attuned to the sound of dog paws on hardwood floors. So I was awake when he went into my office, and quietly, for him, threw-up.

Kids and dogs:  when they throw-up in the middle of the night there’s “things” to take care of.  And by the time I was done with all of that, I was wide awake.  So I did some middle-of-the-night reading.  And I came across an article/opinion on the Fox News app that completely illustrates the central problem America faces today.  

Hit Piece

In the journalism business it’s called a “hit piece”.  There was no real title, but the sub-title is:  Pearl Project investigation exposes 198 Democratic organizations orchestrating Saturday’s #NoKings demonstrations.  The opinion article  states that someone is trying to “fool” the American public, by calling the movement against the Trump Administration, a “grass roots” movement.  The author, Asra Nomani, is the Founder of the “Pearl Project”. That’s her journalism initiative named after the Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl, who was kidnapped and murdered by Al Qaeda in Pakistan while investigating the “shoe bomber” in 2002.  

Nomani links three pivotal progressive leaders to the “NO KINGS DAY” marches that brought millions into the streets to protest Trump:  Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers, Al Sharpton, founder of the National Action Network, and Leah Greenberg, founder of Indivisible (the major organizing group behind NO KINGS).  She claims that while all three were triumphing the clear success of NO KINGS DAY, they failed to note the underlying political involvement of…wait for it… the Democratic Party!!!!

Tax Exempt

Here’s what she said:

According to new research by the Pearl Project, the #NoKings protest is being organized by an estimated 198 groups, all of which are aligned with the Democratic Party and many of which claim tax-exempt, “nonpartisan” nonprofit status. Collectively, these groups take in $2.1 billion in annual revenues”.

She goes on to enumerate some of those organizations, dividing them by their tax status.  And Nomani says, over and over again, that many of them are listed as 501c3, the IRS status that allows non-profit organizations to avoid paying taxes.  They are designated “charitable”.  As part of that status,  they: 

 “are absolutely prohibited from directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office” (IRS).  

The article implies that she “caught them” violating the tax code:  GOTCHA!!!

Exception

What the author fails to note, is that there is a second section to the tax statute, the “exceptions” section.  

“Certain activities or expenditures may not be prohibited depending on the facts and circumstances.  For example, certain voter education activities (including presenting public forums and publishing voter education guides) conducted in a non-partisan manner do not constitute prohibited political campaign activity.” (IRS).

So, one could argue, that the “NO KINGS” marches were “voter education”, or simply expressing their opinions.  And besides, nothing about “NO KINGS” was a political campaign.  President Trump is the President, until 2028, and will not run another campaign.  In fact, there are no candidates or opponents for 2028, to intervene in, yet.  So, for all those 501c3’s, their tax status remains safe.

Nomani also failed to mention that such familiar right-wing political action groups as the Heritage Foundation, the Claremont Foundation, and Hillsdale College, all involved in Project 2025 and electing Donald Trump, are also 501c3’s.  

Radicals

But she does go on to explain all of her work to link “progressive” groups to radical Islam.

The groups include several organizations, including Jewish Voice for Peace and Sarsour’s MPower Change Action Fund, that represent the unholy alliance of Islamist sympathizers and leftists who have fueled fiery protests against the existence of the state of Israel, following the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks by Hamas on Israelis. I’ve identified 1,500 groups in the anti-Semitism protest industry.”

It’s all an “unholy alliance” of radical groups, trying to upend the Trump Administration.  She even drags in the name of a “tycoon”, Neville Roy Singham, who she says funded Chinese Communist propaganda.  While she can’t find a connection to “NO KINGS” or other Resistance activities, she says: “While Singham doesn’t yet appear to have his fingerprints directly on the #NoKings protest, the ideological DNA is the same.”  Or, another way of saying it is she ain’t got a connection.  His name is just in there to say “Chinese Communist Party!!!!”

Silos

Surprise:  there were lots of organizations involved in the incredibly successful “NO KINGS” marches.  How do you think millions of Americans got the word to go to the streets and demonstrate?  Surprise again:  a lot of those groups were political.  And final surprise (shh):  some of them were Democrats!!!

What’s the point?  If all you read (or see, or listen to) is Fox News, you now have ABOSOLUTE PROOF that this is all a vast conspiracy, of unions, Democrats, Islamic radicals, Chinese Communists, to violate tax laws and overthrow the US Government!!!  No wonder you worry about how poor, poor President Trump can survive.  How can all of the foolish protestors be fooled?  Either Democrats are evil, or they are so, so, naïve.  

That’s what life looks life from the “Fox” silo of information.  By the way, the Pearl Project is a 501c3 as well.

It took quite a while to go back to sleep.  

Carrots and Sticks

Take A Hint

Monday, after nearly six months of stalling, President Trump finally figured it out.  All of his “pleasant and wonderful” conversations with Russia’s President Putin failed to move the needle on a Russian/Ukrainian ceasefire (earlier essay; Sir, May I Have Another).  And, despite Trump’s obvious disdain for Ukrainian President Zelenskyy (earlier essay, Stratego or Risk), even Donald Trump got it.  Every time he had his “pleasant” conversation with “dear old Vlad”, it was followed by cities in Ukraine being destroyed by missile and drone attacks.  The “nicer” the conversation, the more severe the attack. 

As the saying goes, “A girl can take a hint”.  And finally, so did Trump.  Monday the President arranged for highly advanced defensive weaponry to be quickly sent to Ukraine.  For the first time, Trump seems, at least a little bit, to be willing to treat Ukraine as an “equal” party in the war, and in his efforts to effect a ceasefire.  

Ukraine Needs

It’s a very, very, Trumpian kind of deal.  He says he isn’t sending the weapons to Ukraine, but to the other NATO nations in Europe.  And he’s not giving the weapons away, he expects full payment:  good for the American defense industry.  But everyone in this “game of telephone” knows who is on the other end.  We sell Patriot Missile Systems to Germany, and the weapons will “skip the middle-man” and go straight to Ukraine.  So the US is charging our own allies for supporting the Ukrainians against Russian aggression.  

But it’s exactly what Zelenskyy needs.  The Russian mass bombing campaign is brutal, targeting mostly civilians.  And the war on the ground is stalemated:  more of a World War I trench warfare situation (As retired Four-Star General Barry McCaffery said, another Battle of Verdun), than World War II’s more ranging tank battles.  As things currently stand; Russia is ultimately the winner in a battle of attrition.  That is, unless NATO, both the European members and the United States, continue to supply Ukraine with offensive weapons, and the means to stop Russian attacks on their cities.

Apple of Putin’s Eye

And that’s what the President of the United States is doing.  Sure, US companies will make their “blood money” in the deal.  And Trump gave Putin a fifty-day grace period to come to “the table”.  After that, Trump promises sanctions designed to wreck the Russian economy, 100% 
“tariffs” on Russian oil (one of the few things they have left to sell).  What really happens in fifty days remains to be seen; after all, there have been tariff deadlines come and go for weeks, and little changed.

But it’s a start, a far cry from February.  It seemed that Trump was negotiating FOR the Russians at that time, and with little interest in the invaded nation.  Except, of course, for Ukraine’s “rare earth” products.  Trump wanted ALL of them.

And for the rest of NATO, it’s a big sigh of relief.  Their greatest threat is an aggressive Russia, pressing borders and demanding concessions.  Trump said that Ukraine is the “apple of Putin’s eye”, but the rest of the former Soviet Union can’t be too far behind.  Moldova, Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia would be next, with Poland and the rest of Eastern Europe not far behind.  If Putin is willing to start another large-scale European War, the NATO allies would much rather fight it in Ukraine, than on the beaches, streets, fields and hills of their own countries.  

Meat Grinder

Putin’s war with Ukraine just got harder.  Trump, a proven admirer of the Russian dictator, is more than willing to give him all of the “normalcy” he wants:  a place at the table in the world economy, a market for Russian oil and gas, an opportunity to take Russia out of the economic stranglehold the war with Ukraine has put them in.  And, of course, the chance to get out of the bloody meat grinder of Ukraine, already estimated to cost 250,000 dead and another 750,000 wounded Russian soldiers (CNN).

So it all comes down to what Putin really wants.  He can have a “normal” economy, with “normal” trade and a “normal” life for most regular Russians.  Or he can continue to wage this war of conquest, with the specter of World War III lurking in the background.  And his nation will remain an economic pariah, cut off from most of the normal intercourse with the rest of the world.

We will soon see if Putin is the cold decision-making KGB Colonel we all have heard about, or if he is next Czar of a Russian Empire we all fear.  Will he give up his dream of a new “Soviet Union”, for the good of the world, and the Russian people he has fed into the meat grinder of East Ukraine?  Or, now with the US grudgingly picking up its share of the fight, will Putin make the cold decision to do what’s right for his own people, and the world, and come to the table?

It’s the Colonel’s call.

It’s Not the Crime, It’s the Coverup

Structural Scheme

So, a long time ago, I promised myself that I wouldn’t get into the Jeffrey Epstein stuff.  It’s too salacious, and too irrelevant to the real damage Trump is doing to our Nation, to spend much time on.  But, from my standpoint, you’ve got to love the imbroglio Trump’s henchmen find themselves in now.  They promised for years to reveal the “Epstein Files”.  They dangled names of Trump opponents like Bill Clinton as “click-bait” to build their careers; podcast flame-throwers like Dan Bongino, Alex Jones, and Charlie Kirk.

The “Epstein rumors” fit nicely into the “structural scheme” of the founding ideology of the far-right QAnon group.  They always “knew” there was pedophilia going on among those “elite” Democrats.  If the kids weren’t in the basement of that pizza shop in Washington, then maybe there were all on Epstein’s island.  And, “of course”, that’s where the “adrenochrome” came from, the magic elixir made from the “stolen blood harvested from youth”.  This all goes farther back then QAnon.  It’s part of the  ancient anti-Semitic tropes, pivoted to attack Democrats and liberals.  Epstein was Jewish, so that all balances out nicely. 

Promises Made

Finally we would find it all out, now that Trump was President, and Bondi Attorney General, and Patel Director of the FBI, and Bongino himself now an FBI Assistant Director.  Trump, Bondi, Patel, Bongino all promised to reveal the “the truth”.  That is — until they didn’t.  On the Saturday evening of the Fourth of July holiday (when they hoped no one was listening); The Department of Justice issued an unsigned memo, saying, essentially, “never mind”.  There is no list, there’s no coverup or conspiracy of silence.  As Obi Won Kenobi says: “There’s no droids to see here, move along, move along”.

We know that’s not true either.  There has to be a file as long as my arm on Epstein.  Interviews, tapes, evidence gathered (like the plane passenger log).  And then there’s Ghislaine Maxwell, the literal keeper of whatever list there is, still alive.  She’s a “guest” of the Federal government, the Justice Department the Trump cohort controls, for the next twenty years.   She’s even in an honors dorm in Tallahassee Federal Prison, with a near-private room (Tallahassee Democrat).  Why isn’t Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, making a “deal” with Maxwell, say a year off for every ten names.  It just seems so logical.

Known, Knowns

There is a list of names, of those who trifled with under-age women provided by Jeffrey Epstein.  The FBI had to compile one to have a case, first against him, then against Maxwell.  We even know some names on it:  like Prince Andrew the son of Queen Elizabeth, and Alan Dershowitz, Harvard Professor and attorney to Donald Trump.  Of course, Dershowitz claimed he “only” got down to his underwear.  No private parts (or under-aged parties) involved with him; just an “old Russian woman” he told us (Above the Law).

Bondi is treating all Americans, but particularly her fans in MAGA-world, like they are stupid.  Trump is letting her do it. And there’s only one logical reason that I can think of for the “Obi-Won treatment”.  Somebody’s name is on that “list”, a named participant; that Trump doesn’t want released. 

Kompromat

Now you can infer anything you want.  Is Trump on the list?  Maybe, though I think he’s smarter than to get drawn into underage kids.  But think of the great “kompromat” (compromising material) the investigative report is to whoever has control of it.  The “302’s”, those written reports by FBI agents, would rival the legendary J. Edgar Hoover files that kept him as Director of the FBI for forty-seven years.  No one knew what Hoover knew.  The inferred power of that information protected his directorship through eight different Presidencies.  Only death itself could remove him from office.

Joe Biden (or Kamala Harris) never promised us Epstein’s files, or who killed President Kennedy, or what’s going on at Area 51.  But Trump did.  And while there probably is nothing new about the assassination, and Area 51 really needs to remain secret, clearly there is stuff about Epstein.  I don’t personally care about it:  any charges against “participants” are far past the statute of limitations.  But  I do think it’s interesting that the “Trump folks” have now decided to pretend there’s nothing to see here.  

They are not very good a governing.  They seem to be even worse at covering up.  

Legal Replacement

Aliens


“They” say, the United States is being invaded. This isn’t just Trumpian rhetoric. It’s a pivotal legal argument behind many of the anti-migrant actions of the Department of Homeland Security.  They cite the Alien Act of 1798 (the John Adams’ Administration) as the legal basis for rounding up non-citizen documented residents, legally in the US,  and deporting them from the country.  The Alien Act allows the President:

 “to order all such aliens as he shall judge dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States, or shall have reasonable grounds to suspect are concerned in any treasonable or secret machinations against the government thereof, to depart out of the territory of the United States…” (National Archives).

Just a little historic background.  In 1798 the new United States was on the verge of war with France. But, more importantly, it was immersed in internal political turmoil.   The governing party, the Federalists led by President John Adams, favored Great Britain.  They knew that the nation was still dependent on trade with their former King.  The British were already at war with France (again), and Adams wanted to maintain commerce, particularly in New England. 

The opposition party, the Democratic-Republicans led by Vice President Thomas Jefferson, were sympathetic to the republican goals of the French revolutionaries.  After all, a lot of their revolutionary principles were copied from America’s documents, including Jefferson’s own Declarations.   They also felt beholden to the American/French Revolutionary alliance against the British.

Adam’s Critics

Adams wanted to be “rid” of the constant criticism he was getting in the Democratic-Republican newspapers and pamphlets.  And there was also an absolute question for the new nation (born only twenty-two years before): who was a citizen?  

Originally, the Articles of Confederation (the precursor to the US Constitution) “passed the buck” to the states to determine citizenship. 

Article IV. The better to secure and perpetuate mutual friendship and intercourse among the people of the different states in this union, the free inhabitants of each of these states, paupers, vagabonds and fugitives from Justice excepted, shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of free citizens in the several states;  (National Archives).

So the states decided, and the Nation accepted the legal actions of each state.  However, when the new United States Constitution took effect in 1788,  Congress passed a more uniform definition of becoming a citizen – the Naturalization Act of 1790 (and 1795):

…any Alien being a free white person, who shall have resided withing the limits and under the jurisdiction of the United States for the term of two years, may be admitted to become a citizen… (Mount Vernon).

Fourteen Years

But two years wasn’t enough for the beleaguered Adams’ Federalists. They felt that “new” migrants were overwhelming supporting their political rivals, the Democratic-Republicans.  So in 1798, they changed the naturalization rules again. This time, it took fourteen years of residence in the United States (almost back to the end of the American Revolution). 

he shall have declared his intention to become a citizen of the United States, five years, at least, before his admission, and shall, at the time of his application to be admitted, declare and prove, to the satisfaction of the court having jurisdiction in the case, that he has resided within the United States fourteen years… (Naturalization Act of 1798).

That gave Adams a lot more latitude to “remove” (under the Alien Act) those ugly voices who were constantly criticizing him.  He used the threat of war to  deal with his “political” problem. And he used citizenship and deportation as a threat to stifle his opponents.  

What’s the Threat?

It is that same “threat of war”; the so-called “invasion” of undocumented migrants, that the Trump Administration is using to round-up long-time US residents today.   They are also using the Alien Act to remove legal residents who exercise their First Amendment right to criticize the government. The Administration claims that those are,  “…now dangerous to the peace and safety of the United States”.

But what is the real threat of undocumented migrants?  The vast majority of migrants are working, contributing, taxpaying members of American society.  Certain industries, including agriculture, construction, food processing, hotels and restaurants; are highly dependent on migrant labor.  And studies shows that the crime rate among the undocumented is far below the rate of “regular” citizens (US House ). 

Great Replacement Theory

Imbedded deep in the “lore” of far-right America, is the concept of the “Great Replacement Theory” (Forum).  A section of the political right believe that the existence of long-term undocumented migrants in the United States is a mortal “political danger” to the MAGA-Republican Party (much as migrants threatened John Adams’ Federalists).  

It starts with this fact: in the next two decades, white people in the United States will become a minority. (Texas A&M).  This is “exacerbated” by the undocumented migrants. They are living in the United States and having children with what’s called “birthright citizenship”. That is the legal principle (14th Amendment) that anyone born in the United States is legally a US citizen.  The issue isn’t that the undocumented are voting.  All the legitimate studies of voting show that US elections are incredibly safe and accurate (Brennan).  But the children of the undocumented ARE LEGAL CITIZENS, and can vote.

And MAGA-world thinks they are going to vote for Democrats. (Just like Adams thought new citizens were voting for the Democratic-Republicans).  Put bluntly:  when the Tucker Carlson’s of the world see “brown people”, they see Democrats, and the end of their political power.  And they are doing something about it.

The Cure

Closing the border,  Gestapo-like sweeps of undocumented migrants, mass deportations, ending birthright citizenship and most importantly, terror and intimidation all have a point.  It hopes to stave off the inevitable statistical fact:  white people will soon be a minority in the United States. So, instead of transitioning the Republican Party to be more diversified and attractive to the coming, non-white majority (as was recommended in the Republican “Autopsy of the 2012 Presidential Election”–ABC), Steven Miller and the 2025 crowd want literally to “maintain” the white face of American politics.

All of the heinous actions of the last six months are their “cure” for their so-called “I see brown people” disease.

The MAGA-2025 guys (and they definitely are guys, white “bros”) are standing on a beach, ordering the tide to stop.  And they are willing to change the essential freedoms of America to save their “vision”,  keep their feet dry, and maintain their own political future.  That’s the basic concern too many Americans overlooked in the 2024 election, as we got bogged down in the price of eggs or the mental health of two late septuagenarians.   Too many Americans missed the point – democracy was on the line.

I hope we’ll get another chance to “cure” that mistake in 2026. 

Maverick

Relax

Last night I came home from a meeting, hungry and hoping to relax before bed.  So, I ate a bowl of Skyline Chili (after all, I am a born and bred Cincinnatian), and sat down to catch up on the world.  First was an hour of political commentary. It explained how the Trump Administration nominated  thirty year-old Paul Ingressia, a  “ride or die” Trumper, to head the Office of Special Counsel.  What does the Office of Special Counsel do?  Primarily, the job is to protect “whistleblowers”, members of the Federal government who call out wrong-doing in their own agencies.

The Trump Administration is on a continual witch-hunt for the self-same “whistleblowers”. They want to silence the consistently critical attacks of Trump’s riding roughshod over Federal law and procedure.  Appointing Ingressia isn’t putting “the fox in the chicken coop”:  this is sending the chickens to the fox for protection.  

So that wasn’t particularly relaxing.

Top Gun

Then, after all of our “usual” Thursday night shows were reruns, I decided to join a movie, “in progress”.  I dropped into the second half of Top Gun, Maverick, the twenty years later sequel to the original blockbuster, Top Gun.  It’s a movie about redemption.  Maverick, played by Tom Cruise, is a hot-shot test pilot whose program is cut.  He faces retirement from the Navy, until he is saved by his friend and commander, Iceman.  The nation needs a special assignment with a special leader, and Maverick is the only man to do it.

The plot line is a variation on the original Top Gun.  But this time, there’s a rogue nation, enriching uranium in a deep, underground facility.  The only way to prevent this nation from gaining a nuclear weapon is to destroy the heavily guarded secret base.  And the Navy is tasked with sending a squad of carrier launched F-18’s to strategically place the bombs down a ventilation shaft. They have to fly an impossible corridor, then hit a target about the size of a refrigerator. But that’s the only way to destroy the complex.

In fact, the first attack opens the shaft, and the second attack drops bombs down the shaft to destroy the facility.  

Precision Bombing

It’s a carefully planned assault. Additional cruise missiles are launched to take out as much of the opposition weaponry as possible.  And it’s a precision strike with special weapons.  If you’re into aircraft carriers, dog fights at supersonic speeds, and Tom Cruise “macho”, it’s a pretty good movie.  But last night I watched it with a whole new perspective.

Do you think President Trump watched the movie?  How about Pete Hegseth, another “Bro” (along with young Mr. Ingressia) who seems to be over his head as Defense Secretary?  Because the attack on “the foe” in Top Gun, Maverick, seems oddly in line with the US attack on Iran just a few weeks ago.

Even the terminology was similar:   size of a refrigerator, two bombs to open the door, two bombs to destroy the facility. The US and a highly organized precision attack.  Sure, there wasn’t the drama of Americans shot down over enemy territory. No one stole an old F-14 (just like in the original Top Gun).  But is fiction mimicking fact, or did the Trump Administration take fiction and try to make it factual?

Drama

We know that Trump and his political handlers are all about “the drama”.  In fact, in my opinion, Donald Trump is the President of the United States because of their adept use of the assassination attempt in Pennsylvania. Before that attack, Trump and Biden were “even” in the polling, despite Biden’s poor showing in their only debate.  But, after the drama, the raised fist over the blood-stained face, “Fight-Fight-Fight”, and the carefully staged Trump “resurrection” at the Republican Convention (remember the Trump kiss of the fire helmet?); it was clear the entire Presidential race was altered.  Biden dropped out a few days later.

In fact, the Trump folks were terribly annoyed after the attack, that the media attention turned to whether the enriched uranium was actually destroyed.  I think they were looking for the celebration scene on the flight deck, this time with crowds raising the B-2 bomber crews after their thirty hour mission half-way around the world and back.  Trump followed Director Joseph Kosinski’s lead; from precision bombing (the refrigerator) to the cruise missile distractions, to the most advanced bombers in the real world,“Bat-Wing” B-2.  

Awake

But they somehow didn’t get the popular results they expected.  It wasn’t “just like” the movie.

What really concerns me is this.  If the administration is taking their cues from popular movies, what’s the next “act” going to be?  They already are following the plot of the TV show, Twenty-Four, ignoring the law for the “greater good”.  Are we playing out in real time one of the “middle” Star Wars movies, where the Empire seems inevitable and the Jedi Knights are vanquished?  Or is this some darker sequel, more of a Manchurian Candidate kind of thing?  

I didn’t relax much.  And it wasn’t the chili that kept me awake.

Sir, May I Have Another

Talk

President Trump had a “conversation” with President Putin of Russia on Saturday.  From what we can gather, Trump tried to persuade Putin to join Ukraine in a ceasefire.  Putin didn’t give Trump a definitive answer on the phone, other than saying Russia hadn’t achieved their war goals yet.  After they hung up the call, Putin launched one of the largest drone and missile attacks of the war on Kyiv, the Ukrainian capital.  Those attacks haven’t let up.  Last night, Kyiv was attacked again:  700 drones and missiles tried to overwhelm Ukrainian defenses.

Trump voiced his frustration with Putin’s actions, but his response to continuing mass attacks on Ukraine is just words.  And when asked why his Defense Secretary held up weapons shipments to Ukraine, he feigned ignorance.  At least, let’s hope he “feigned” it.  Because if the President of the United States really didn’t know that his own military was holding up weapons to the beleaguered nation, that’s a whole different issue.  Trump’s foreign policies are difficult enough to follow, without the inexperienced Defense Secretary, Pete Hegseth, going “rogue”.  

Bully

For a number of years I was the Dean of Students of a high school.  One of the most difficult parts of the job was dealing with “bullies”.  It sounds like it should be easy:  find the bully, and remove him or her (yes, her, sometimes the hardest cases).  But it was often not that clear cut, with blame enough to go around.  And, the normal “first punch” rule didn’t necessarily apply, since the victim was often the one who finally responded with force.  

Parents expected that their complaints would be immediately resolved. We tried.  We used “progressive discipline”: each offense earned a more serious penalty, until a crisis was reached.  To frustrated adults, all “the talk” was a waste of time. It enabled their child to be bullied even more.  They wanted action.  And they blamed the school if something wasn’t done, right now.  

Sometimes “the talk” really did work, and bullying ended at the lowest level.  But when it didn’t, things often got ugly.  My toughest phone conversations were with parents convinced we weren’t doing enough.  They thought we were “being played” by the bully, or his parents.

Take a Stand

At the end of the “progression”, I had to take a stand.  The “bully” was removed from the scene.  And if it was beyond the school, especially as social media bullying became more prevalent, then the local police and Courts were included in the solution.  When we ended up in Court, it was important to be able to show all the steps we tried, everything we did before we finally removed the bully from school.   

Because for some “bullies”, words were useless.   Whatever made them want to harass another student was so much more important to them than anything the school administration could do. They wouldn’t stop.  And, from the Dean of Student’s office, nothing was more frustrating than “just talk”, talk that didn’t work.  It felt helpless, like the poor fraternity pledge in the old movie “Animal House”, bending over in his underwear, waiting for the paddle, then saying “Thank You Sir, may I have another”.  (An historic note: it was Kevin Bacon’s first movie role).

Leader of the Free World

There’s a vision:  Putin with the paddle, and Donald Trump asking for another.  Every phone call where Trump asks for “peace”, Putin returns with an increased attack on Ukraine.  The only problem is, it’s not Trump that taking the “blow”. It’s the good people of Ukraine.  And instead of the United States, at least, providing more defensive weapons to stop the attacks, our “Defense Bro” Secretary is holding up the shipments.  

And maybe that’s the real Trump strategy.  Let Russia attack and let Ukraine suffer so that their President Zelenskyy will “give up”, and accept both the Russian incursions and US demands for “rare earth”.   I think that’s a terrible plan. It’s likely to give Russia “permission” to bully the other nations that once were part of the Soviet Union. But at least it would be “a plan”. 

Because right now it looks like the Trump Administration is just bending over in its collective underwear, waiting for  “Pledge Master” Putin to give Ukraine another.  That’s an incredibly weak look, for the “leader of the free world”.

Paranoia Strikes Deep – Ohio and  Public Education 

Be Afraid

Ask most Ohio public school teachers if they’re worried about  state support for public education, and you’ll get a frightened nod. For those “old veterans” with twenty or more years in the classroom, you might get an even louder “YES”.  And there are good reasons to think the State of Ohio (the General Assembly and the Governor) believe that public education ISN’T the solution to teaching Ohio’s children. They seem to be doing everything to help it fail.

It all starts with Ohio’s State Constitution.  Article VI, Section 2 states:

“The General Assembly shall make such provisions, by taxation, or otherwise, as with the income arising from the school trust fund, will secure a thorough and efficient system of common schools throughout the state; but no religious or other sect, or sects, shall every have any exclusive right to, or control of, any part of the school funds of this state” (emphasis added).

Battle Lines

Even in the legal language of the 1850’s the meaning seems pretty clear.  The General Assembly (the legislature) WILL do two things.  First, set up a common (public) school system, or systems, throughout the state.  And second, that system will not be based on a religion.  Clearly while religious schools can exist, they cannot control any part of the public school funds.

There is a Constitutional mandate for public schools, and a Constitutional prohibition against using public funds for religious or “sects” schools.  It’s just that simple. 

The Numbers

But here in Ohio, it’s not that simple at all.  There are 609 individual school districts in Ohio.  The five smallest districts in Ohio have under 200 students.  But  the largest school districts in the state are:

Student Pop.         School District*

  • 47000                    Columbus
  • 34500                    Cincinnati
  • 33200                    Cleveland 
  • 24100                    Olentangy  (suburban Columbus – North)
  • 22000                    South-Western (suburban Columbus – Southwest)
  • 21300                    Toledo
  • 20000                    Akron
  • 17400                    Lakota (suburban Cincinnati – North)
  • 17000                    Dublin  (suburban Columbus – Northwest)
  • 16300                    Hilliard (suburban Columbus – West).

            *Source – Ohio Department of Education

Maybe the issue for Republican state leaders is that five of the top ten school districts (and the three largest) are from primarily Democratic areas.  And since the Legislature and Governor are committed to gerrymandering the state as Republican as possible, the students of those districts are dramatically unrepresented.  

Black and White

Or maybe the issue is about “urban” versus “rural”.  The State Assembly is dominated by members from rural areas of the state.  The Governor himself grew up in a rural village.  The problems of urban school districts are “alien” to their “small town” upbringing:  they don’t relate.

And this clash of backgrounds includes inherent racism.  The urban districts, Columbus, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Toledo, Akron (and Dayton farther down the list) are 75% or more minority.  Even the “suburban” school districts in the top ten are 35% to 50% minorities. (For comparison:  I taught in the Southwest Licking School District, 64th largest with 4890 students, and 29% minorities, and went to high school in the Wyoming School District, 224th largest with 1880 students and 25% minority) (ODE).

Most of the decision makers in the Assembly and the Governor’s office went to schools that were overwhelmingly white.  

Follow the Money

88.6% of Ohio’s school children go to public schools.  Of the remaining kids, 8.8% go to private schools, and 2.7% are home-schooled (Policy Matters).   The Ohio state government spends about $8 Billion a year on public schools.  But the State is also spending over $1 Billion for private schools, including religious and “sect” schools, as part of a “voucher” program.  That’s over 10% of the state money that goes to education (Signal).  And if that “sounds” like a violation of the State Constitution, Article VI, Section 2:  it is.  A Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge ruled that a couple of weeks ago (Ohio Capital Journal).

That 10% could make a big difference to public schools. It’s a billion dollars of all Ohio taxpayers money going to private, often religious, schools.  But Common Pleas is the lowest court in the Ohio hierarchy, with the Appeals Court and the Supreme Court to go.  The Supreme Court, now six Republicans (including the Governor’s son) and one Democrat, may ignore the Constitutional language to further their political agenda.  They’ve done it before.

Wild Wild West

Ohio has been called  the “Wild, Wild West” of nearly unregulated private schooling.  There are 1355 private schools, and another 330 Charter schools in the state.  Those schools not only spend private money, now they are using state voucher money without supervision.  The most egregious example was the online school, ECOT, which fraudulently took over $117 million in public school money.  It was closed in 2018. But, the owner of ECOT, William Lager, made large political contributions to legislative leaders. He was never charged with any crimes.

ECOT is gone, (and Lager retired to his out-of-state mansion) but the financial bonanza for private schools continues here.  And state leaders continue to benefit financially from them.  Even the public school teacher retirement system is “fair game”. 

 Elected reformers wanted to change the almost $20 billion in pension investments (out of a total of $96 Billion) going into “private equity” firms to more transparent public investments. But, the State Assembly in a “midnight addition” last month, completely changed the System’s governance board.  The elected seven to four reform member majority, will soon be seven reformers to eight appointees of the state government, and ultimately eight to only three elected representatives of those who paid into the system.   The private equity firms are big political contributors too (The Fix Is In).

Rolling Back

The State Assembly has more “fish to fry” for the public schools. While the state provides a significant amount of public school budgets, most funding comes from local property and income taxes. Republican leaders want to change those as well. In the last state budget, provisions to cut back on the “inside millage”, the non-voted taxes schools could depend on, were enacted. In addition, the Assembly wants schools to stop “saving money” for future years, ordering money in excess of 30% of the district’s budget returned to the taxpayers.

Even Governor DeWine thought that was too much. He vetoed those provisions from the budget. But the Ohio Assembly is so gerrymandered, that it is technically “veto proof”. The Republicans have enough votes to override DeWine’s objections, and are seriously considering doing so. That’s just another “hit”against public education.

What’s Going Down

And all of this doesn’t include the innumerable legislative mandates placed on public education in the past two decades.  State mandated testing superseded grades as the prime determinate for graduation, and now is a critical part of teacher evaluation as well.   Do teachers “teach to the test”?  They sure do, because their jobs depend on it.  Is that “good education”?  Of course not, but it is an artificial measure that schools with lower economic students are likely to fail.  And since they don’t “pass the tests”; well that’s a great reason to stop spending money on them, according to the Assembly. Send it to the private schools.

And what’s really happening in the private schools?  They can teach what they want, whatever religious regulations they believe, because, after all, they’re private.  And since many of those schools align with the Christian conservatism of the legislative and executive leadership of the state; that works out fine for everyone.

Except, of course, for most taxpayers, public schools, public school students, and public school teachers.  They’re left “holding the bag” as money and power flow to the influential few who control the purse.  Public school teachers aren’t “paranoid”, they aren’t “making it up”.   Ohio is a state that finances private education.  Ohio spend taxpayers money, mine and yours, to further religion.  It’s leaving public education, and educators, behind.  And the folks in the State House want it that way.

Dogs, Jeeps, Fireworks and Beer Coolers

Story Time

It’s been a while since I’ve written a “real” Sunday Story.  Over the eight years of “Our America” there’s been literally thousands of essays about politics.  But sprinkled throughout those years there have been “stories” that aren’t about foreign affairs or political machinations or Constitutional theories.  They’re just about experiences in my life; what my classes in the “old days” would call “story time”.  Maybe at the end of the tale, I would find  a way back to the “lesson plan”, but often it was just to pull the group together: sixth graders, eighth, freshmen or seniors; to that time when history was simply “his” story (and of course “her” story as well!!).

There’s a long list of those stories at the end of this essay; about dogs, cars, kidnappings, track, hiking, travel and just life.  So, after a long sabbatical (a Sunday reference) from Story Time here’s an actual, non-political, Sunday “Story”. Even more, it’s on an actual Sunday.

Long Covid

Friday was the Fourth of July.  Here in Pataskala, in the “modern age” of unrestricted fireworks sales, our house was in the middle of a “war zone”.  There were rockets to the East, Boomers to the West, Screamers to the South, and even Spinners to the North.  And it wasn’t off in the distance, downtown Columbus fireworks.  All of these were within a couple hundred feet, and all were going off at the same time.

I think that’s a “habit” (or practice) our town picked up during Covid of 2020, when the “4th of July” was cancelled.  Crowds weren’t allowed to gather, even the local teams played to empty stadiums.  But, the good folks of Pataskala weren’t having it.   And with a Fireworks store just down the road in Kirkersville, many spent thousands of dollars, their “Covid Relief Money”, to put on their own demonstration of Independence.  To be honest, I don’t think it was legal then, but the local police didn’t seem to care.   

And, in one way, that is a great way to celebrate Independence.  Americans, in small family and neighborhoods groups, firing off rockets to proclaim personal independence as well as National “freedom”.  To stand in our front yard and simply “spin” was exciting, as was the smoke of spent gunpowder, and probably the smell as well, though that sense is lost to me – thanks to Covid of 2021. 

Rocket’s Red Glare

But Fireworks, at least close to home, aren’t really enjoyable anymore.  With our four dogs, we always had one or two that got unnerved by the “swish-bomb”, and particularly the  Boomers.  And now, that’s changed for the worse.  While Atticus, our Yellow Lab really could care less (“I’m a gun dog, Dad”), the other three hit panic mode when there’s even a single loud pop.  So Friday night in the middle of the “war zone”, Jenn and I were fully engaged in dog psycho-therapy.  At first, we had the TV up as loud as possible on the New York City, Macys Fireworks.  And even though it was the picture of fireworks over the soundtrack of music (“…It’s up to you, New York, NEW YORK!!”)  they still could hear the “…bombs bursting in air”, just outside the windows.  

Lou was barking, Keelie’s eyes were white-rimmed, and poor CeCe did nothing but shake.  Finally, about 11:30pm, the roar subsided and the dogs relaxed.  We all fell asleep together to old re-runs of NCIS.

Topless

This year, Ohio went from a cold, wet spring, to the height of August Summer.  There wasn’t a lot of “preliminary warmup” days:  it was cool damp sixties one weekend, and mid-eighties the next.  In June that just kept going, with day after day of ninety plus temperatures.  Maybe it’s global warming (whoops, that’s climate change now) or maybe it’s being sixty-eight years old and the heat is more bothersome.  But it’s really hot.

Hot enough that I’ve dismantled the Jeep.  The top’s down, and  the doors, side curtains, and windows are all in the garage.  I even bought new side mirrors so I can actually see what’s happening on the highway when I change lanes!  It’s hot out, but there’s nothing like sixty-mile an hour “air conditioning” in an open Jeep, my foot posted on the door frame.  

Jeep Memory

I’ve been a Jeep guy for thirty-one years, and there’s all sorts of memories around them.  I wanted a Jeep for a long time.  But buying one was always a “luxury” that I didn’t want to afford.  It wasn’t until I was almost forty that I finally broke down and bought one.  It was more the  mid-career paycheck, than a mid-life crisis.  It was a basic Wrangler, the rearview mirror, back seat, and radio all were “extras”.  But once I drove it in the summer with the top off, I was hooked.  That Jeep lasted  fifteen years.  It’s still a “toy” in a garage of a friend now, looking better than ever.

So I’m on Jeep Two, this one now over two decades old, even eligible for “Historic” plates.  And there was one friend who enjoyed that stripped down Jeep even more than I did.  I coached with Chuck Eastham for a decade back in the 1990’s.  Chuck was a Marine Veteran, an eighteen year old who went to Vietnam and came back with a lifetime of memories. As we found out on team “road trips”,  many of those memories still haunted him in the night.  But riding in the Jeep, with his foot on the door frame, always brought back a smile, the skinny eighteen-year old in a government Jeep going where he pleased.

Summer Heat

One last summer heat memory came back in full force this week.  I spent the afternoon cutting grass.  While I do most of the mowing on an old John Deere lawn tractor, there are still sections of the yard that require push mowing.  Jenn wants me to buy a new, self-propelled push mower.  But we’ve got a perfectly fine, old one. Well, not perfectly fine.  The self-propulsion gizmo gave up in the early twenty teens, and the oil drain plug is frozen solid.  But it starts, it  runs, and it cuts.  You just have to do some pushing.

So after a couple of hours of mowing at ninety degrees, there’s nothing in this world like the first sip of a cold beer.  That is, unless the last sip last night was the last beer in the “garage fridge”.  Then, it’s jump in the Jeep, and go find more.

I went across the street to the gas station and walked into their “beer cave”.  It’s a walk-in cooler with all sorts of beer stacked up, a great idea since they need to store cases of beer anyway.  And when I stepped inside, a whole load of memories opened up.

Team Camp

When I was coaching cross country, we took the teams to Camp Falling Rock in August.  It was a whole lot of summer sun running in the hills of eastern Licking County.  The conditioning was important, but the biggest part of the “team camp” was becoming a team.  That happened on the long runs, out on narrow dirt-gravel roads. And it happened as they struggled up “Techniglas Hill”, or the climb on the dirt path from lower camp to our cabins on the upper camp.  

And the team also “bonded”  in the kitchen, as each class prepared their “meal” for the rest of the team.  By the time we left Falling Rock, we all had shared experiences, suffering in the heat, cooking in the kitchen, play “combat” capture the flag in the night, sitting telling stories around a campfire.  It was a “rite of passage” of Watkins Cross Country, from the time we started in 1996.  It still is today.

But one of the “perks” of being the coach, was that  at some point on those hot days, after the tough runs, you had to step into the walk-in cooler to get the food out for dinner.  And nothing felt as good as inhaling twenty-four degree air after sweating through a ninety degree run.  It was an instant of pure relief.  

And that all came back with the first breath,  as I searched for the “right” beer at the Duke and Duchess station across Broad from the house.   It’s summer beer “rules” for us:  Corona for me, Corona Premier for Jenn.  We’ll get back to the heavy micro-brews after Labor Day.

The Sunday Story Series

2021

2022

2023

2024

2025

My Medicare

Tea Party

2010 was the year of the “Tea Party” Revolution.  Barack Obama was in his second year of his Presidency, and the Nation was well on the way to recovery from the Stock Market Crash of 2008. (Isn’t it funny, Obama gets the country going the right direction, and the Tea Party shows up.  Biden gets the country through the economy of Trump’s Covid debacle, and, two years later, Trump wins again).

The Affordable Care Act was finally passed at the end of 2009, and while almost forty million Americans gained access to health care, it was highly controversial.  The Republican Party convinced many Americans that it was a “free ride” for too many who didn’t deserve it, and that it would escalate the “average” guy’s insurance costs.  

True or not, many Americans turned to the “Tea Party”, a Koch Brothers funded “grass roots” movement.  Tea Party members were dedicated to cutting the deficit and debt of the United States.  And when they voted in November, Republicans gained control of the Congress. 

One of the outcomes of that political change was the “Pay as You Go” Act of 2010.  It required that if the debt of the United States grew too big, too fast; automatic cuts in spending called “sequestrations” would go into effect.   It’s a simple concept:  if the debt grows too much, then some of the “big ticket” items get cut.  One of those on the cut-list is Medicare.

Government Health

Just to be clear, there are several government health assistance programs.  Medicare is the best known, a law passed in the mid-1960’s.  It required most Americans to pay into FICA (Federal Insurance) as part of their payroll taxes.  After ten years of paying, they become eligible for health insurance at sixty-five years of age.  Insuring the elderly is the most expensive type of insurance, so now the government assures most of those sixty-five and older that they will be insured.

Medicaid is a different program.  It recognizes that there are Americans that cannot afford insurance, either through their own conditions, or inability to work, or other defined reasons.  These folks are granted government aid for health care.  One of the biggest groups on Medicaid is children of parents who are impoverished.  The idea is that just because the parents can’t afford insurance, the kids should still get health care.

The Affordable Care Act was a bridge between regular private health insurance, usually through an employer, and Medicaid.  Those who earn too much to qualify for Medicaid, but are unable to get regular employee insurance, could get reduced cost insurance on the “market” created by the ACA.  While it was controversial in 2009, it’s withstood the “test of time” and most of its provisions are assumed to be fundamental today.

Big Beautiful Bill

So what’s all this about?  The “Big Beautiful Bill”, seems doomed to passage this morning at the House of Representatives is poised to take a final vote.  It does a lot to health care.  The ”BBB” directly cuts almost a trillion dollars from Medicaid.  Why are they cutting such a fundamental health program?  Since the “BBB” contains huge tax cuts for the wealthy, there’s less money coming into the Government.  To make up for the loss of income, there needs to be some commensurate cut in spending.  

And since the “BBB” has huge increases in spending for Trump’s attack on undocumented Americans, as well as the Defense Department, something else has to go.  Medicaid is the program that’s taking the biggest hit.

But nowhere in the “BBB” is there a provision for cutting Medicare.  So why are Democrats claiming that it will?

Pay As You Go

The Congressional Budget Office is the non-partisan “score-keeper” for Congressional legislation.  Their analysts determine the financial plusses and minuses, and project the impact of any legislation on the US deficit (spending over income per year) and US Debt (the total amount the US has spent over income).  And the CBO is clear.  The “BBB” will increase the US Debt by $3.5 Trillion in the next ten years (CBO).

Past Congresses are so sure that the CBO is “fair”, that they based the “Pay as You Go” Act on the CBO’s scoring.  Whether the Republicans in Congress or the President like it (and they don’t) the passage of the “BBB” will trigger the “Pay as You Go” Act sequestration.  And what will be sequestered?  $500,000,000,000 (that’s $500 Billion)  over the next ten years that is currently going to Medicare.  That’s more than is actually in the total Trust Fund right now.

The Medicare fund was already in trouble.  The amount that the “Baby Boomers” paid in over their forty-some years of work-life, isn’t enough to cover the current costs of health care.  And the current “contributors” aren’t enough to make it up, plus save for their own future care.  In addition, the Congress has felt comfortable borrowing from the Medicare Trust Fund (and other funds, 20% of the US Debt is from US held funds – Peterson).

Congress can always change “its” mind.  They might add money to Medicare (or pay back what was borrowed).  Or, they might re-write the “Pay As You Go” Act.  But those are might’s and maybe’s.  What is “fact” today:  The “BBB” will cut Medicare – perhaps all of it.  

If you sixty-five or older, better start filling that “penny jar”!!

You’ll need it.

More Word Games

Fuss at Glastonbury

I have questions. Is it possible to be appalled with the fate of the Palestinians in Gaza, and also appalled at the Hamas attack in October 7th?  Can I believe in the right of both Israelis and Palestinians to exist?  And did the Hamas attack of 10-7 give Netanyahu a “Carte Blanche” to kill all the Palestinians to “make sure” he got every member of Hamas?

There is a British punk/rap group named  Bob Vylan.  They’re not “my cup of tea”, but at the Glastonbury Festival (think Coachella here in US) Vylan spoke out for the Palestinians. In fact, they had the crowd chanting “Death to the IDF!!” (Israel Defense Force – the Israeli army). 

That created a big fuss in the UK. The Chief Rabbi in London called them anti-Semitic, and the Glastonbury constabulary is investigating charges. There’s no First Amendment in the UK, though freedom of speech is still a right.  But, it is more limited there than in the United States.  And, the BBC was broadcasting the concert live – the chant went over the air internationally.  The United States response was to  revoke Vylans’ visas.  Their next concert in France was cancelled as well.

The Goose

Is calling for an army’s death anti-Semitic?  If Netanyahu says he will destroy Hamas – is that the same as destroy Palestinians?  It seems so to him. There’s an old English expression – “What’s good for the goose is good for the gander”.    Looks to me like one bird is going free, and one is getting cooked. 

This isn’t “Palestine will be free, from the river to the sea!!”, a chant clearly aimed at removing the Israelis/Jews, in the land between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean.   The IDF is the exact agent aimed at the Palestinian people. Are Ukrainians being racist when they hope to destroy the Russian Army?  

The Victims

A couple of weeks ago, I wrote an essay about the “appropriation” of the term anti-Semitism, ”Not His Choice”.   There are a lot of folks, many not Jewish, who are determining what is “anti-Semitic” and what is not.  And, at the moment, the term “anti-Semitic” seems to be a cloak of invincibility wrapped around the actions of the Israeli government.  Any criticism by, say; a candidate for Mayor of New York City, or the students of Harvard University, or a punk/rap group in the United Kingdom, are automatically labeled anti-Semitic.   

A lot of the time it seems like “throwing down” anti-Semitism is really more about the political goals of the “thrower”, rather than actually protecting Jewish people from attack.  Does Harvard, and other universities, need to do a better job of parsing free speech and threats?  They absolutely do.  But, for all those American conservatives who complained that they weren’t “listened to” on campuses, it seems like their sudden interest in protecting Jewish students is, at least, convenient. It’s more an intersection of common interest. Actually, it seems more like getting vengeance for their own perceived victimhood.

Friends Tell Friends

It’s easy to attack punk/rappers, and international students, for trying to stand up for the victims they are seeing.  Palestinians in Gaza are starving, mostly because of the actions of the state of Israel, the IDF.  More than 600 Palestinians have been killed just waiting in line for food.  It takes a particular brand of callousness to see their plight as “payback” for the actions of Hamas.  What’s happening to them is wrong,  just like it’s wrong to see criticism of that starvation, as being an attack on “all Jewish people”; anti-Semitism. 

But politically, Israel is the ally of the United States.  We cooperated in the bombing campaign of Iran, culminating in the dropping of more than $3 Billion worth of bombs by the US in one day of attacks three weeks ago.  And, the US also provides a huge part of the defense “umbrella” for Israel against Iranian responses.  

The US has a lot in common with Israel.  But, sometimes “friends” need to tell “friends” when they are wrong – and what Israel is doing to the Palestinians in Gaza is wrong.  And if that makes me, in some circles,  an “anti-Semite” who is 54% Semite; so be it.

The Republican Plan

Ohio Voters Get the Shaft

The Ohio House and Senate sent their budget to Governor DeWine last week.  There was one, clear, over-arching theme in their work product:  make the rich, richer, and do it on the backs of working Ohioans.   It’s exactly why that same body completely ignored two popularly elected Ohio Constitutional amendments against gerrymandering.  They want unlimited power, unfettered control, and to make sure their “real” constituents benefit.  And this week, they sure used it.

Governor DeWine, unlike President Trump, has one more power over legislation.  The President has a single choice when he gets legislation, he can allow it all to become law, or reject it all with a veto.  But DeWine, and several other Governors, can issue a “line item” veto.   Portions of a bill can be rejected without rejecting the entire project.  Those vetoes are subject to override (just like the President).  In fact, it’s easier to do in the Buckeye State. It only takes three-fifths of the legislature (both the House and the Senate) to override the Governor’s line items.  For the President the Congress needs two-thirds vote of each House.  

Veto or Not

Gerrymandering guarantees that the Ohio Senate has twenty-four Republicans and nine Democrats.  Three-fifths means twenty votes, so it’s easy for the majority party to override DeWine’s objections.  The Ohio House is even more lopsided, with sixty-five Republicans and thirty-four Democrats.  It takes sixty votes for an override.  So while DeWine vetoed some of the most egregious budget items, particularly ones that will have drastic impacts on public school finances, the fight isn’t over.  

DeWine accepted parts of the budget that will make sure that, here in Ohio, “the Heart of it All”, the rich will get richer.  The biggest is the “flat tax”, requiring every Ohio taxpayer to pay the same percentage of their income in tax.  While that may sound “fair”, in reality it shifts the tax burden from the wealthy (now paying a higher rate in a “progressive” tax) to those with less income.  And since that means less money to the state, the legislature has cut money for health care, education, and other items that “regular” citizens depend on.  

Oh, except for the $600 million for the Browns new stadium.  Ohio has the money for that, and even exempted the Browns from the “Art Modell Law” which kept them from leaving the city of Cleveland.   So a new “dome” will go out by the Cleveland airport, and the renaissance of downtown Cleveland will take a huge hit.  But I’m sure the legislators will find it easier to find parking in Brook Park.

Liars Figure

And if this effort to make sure the “rich get richer” sounds familiar:  check out what’s going on in Washington, DC right now.  President Trump’s so-called “Big Beautiful Bill” is currently dragging through the US Senate.  Ultimately there will be a very narrow vote for or against it. (Though if you’re betting, bet that it will pass).  It’s the biggest income “redistribution” legislation in US history. It moves more money to the wealthy, and leaves regular Americans “holding the bag”.  Sure, everyone’s income tax might be reduced a little bit. But the rising cost of health care, and the ultimate cost of huge increases in government deficits, will wipe out the lower and middle class reductions almost immediately.  

Of course, the folks in the White House say that’s “a lie” (White House).  The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), as unbiased a group as the government has, reports that the Bill as proposed in the Senate will raise the US debt by over $3.3 Trillion in the next ten years.  The White House argues that the CBO isn’t “figuring” it right.  Here’s the deal (as in, “figures lie and liars figure”).

The CBO uses a simple process: they look at the taxes that the “Big Beautiful Bill” doesn’t bring in, and the spending that the bill doesn’t cut, and come up with their debt figure.  It’s called a “static estimate”.   The White House uses a different process.  They estimate how much the money that doesn’t come in as taxes will stimulate the economy.   That stimulation will create “new tax money” , according to them, and offset the tax cuts to reduce the debt.

Trickling Down

For those of us who were around, it sounds a lot like the Ronald Reagan, “trickle down economics”.  Let the rich keep their money and they’ll spend it, so that everyone has more money.  Of course, that didn’t work out in the 1980’s.  Anyway, the White House calls it a “dynamic estimate”,  and tries to ignore the CBO.

So the rich get richer, both from Washington, and from the Buckeye State. Meanwhile programs that feed hungry children, provide health care for the poor, keep rural hospitals open, support public education, and a whole raft of other programs get cut.  Something had to go, or the future debt would be so high that no one, not even the US House, could swallow it.  

But the Browns get their stadium.  And President Trump gets $1.2 billion to rebuild his “gift Air Force One” from Qatar, a plane he’ll never get to use as President.   Wouldn’t want  either of them to “suffer”.    As for the rest of us, President Bush said it best:

“There’s an old saying in Tennessee – I know it’s in Texas, probably in Tennessee – that says, fool me once, shame on – shame on you. Fool me – you can’t get fooled again.”

Bush fought to lower taxes for the rich.  And, he increased the United States debt by $4.2 trillion: No Foolin’.