Nixon Went to China<\/p>\n
A little History<\/strong><\/p>\n Richard Nixon was a World War II vet, who made his political career based on his anti-Communism. As a Republican Congressman, he was a key part of the House Un-American Activities Committee, searching for Communists in US society. He was in on the beginning of what we now call McCarthyism. He won his first Senatorial race in 1950, running in California against Helen Gahagan Douglas. While this wasn\u2019t the only \u201cugly\u201d campaign of 1950, Nixon went to great lengths to claim that Douglas was a Communist sympathizer. To give his candidacy even more momentum, the Korean War broke out in the middle of the election cycle.<\/p>\n Nixon went on to be a highly visible member of the Senate, and was used to \u201cbalance\u201d the more moderate Dwight Eisenhower on the 1952 Presidential ticket. Nixon, the ultimate anti-Communist, became Vice President. After eight years as VP, a close Presidential defeat to Kennedy in 1960, and an abject failure in the 1964 California Governor\u2019s race, Nixon came back to win the Presidency in 1968. He ran on a Vietnam \u201cpeace plan\u201d which ultimately led the US to stay in the war for another six years.<\/p>\n Nixon\u2019s chief foreign policy advisor was Henry Kissinger, later Secretary of State. Kissinger believed in a world view of \u201cReal-Politik,\u201d which attempted to balance the US against foreign adversaries. He saw that a key to ending the Vietnam War was to get China to help balance Soviet (Russian) influence on the North Vietnamese. The problem was that since the 1950\u2019s, Chinese Communism was seen as the ultimate failure of US policy.<\/p>\n And in 1972, Nixon was at the height of his power. He was running for re-election, and it was before the Watergate crisis was revealed, the \u201ccancer\u201d that would eat away his Presidency. To open communication with Mao Zedong, the Communist dictator of China, was the ultimate betrayal of what Richard Nixon stood for his entire political life. The nation: both Democrats and Republicans trusted in that reputation.<\/p>\n He could go to China. He had the credentials, and the ability to convince his followers, that this was not a betrayal of American values. Only Nixon could go to China. \u00a0He went.<\/p>\n Today<\/strong><\/p>\n Donald Trump is struggling.\u00a0\u00a0 The \u201cRussiagate\u201d crisis is eroding his Presidency, the constant drip of damage: from security clearances to marital infidelity to Mueller indictments; distracts from any focus his Presidency has found. He goes to great lengths to maintain his base, the thirty percent who seem to deem any of his actions as acceptable.<\/p>\n Yesterday Trump sat in a meeting with kids and parents of school shootings. While we can marvel that it required \u201cnotes\u201d to make sure the President was empathetic, in reality it was a gutsy move by the Presidential staff. They took a huge risk putting him out there, and, while Trump seemed unable to display the real feeling that other Presidents would have found (GW Bush or Obama), he did seem to listen to them.<\/p>\n He is still the President. And he is the leader of \u201chis base.\u201d They are also the most adamant against any form of gun control. He has followed their lead, and they have lead him to the Oval Office.<\/p>\n Trump could \u201cgo to China.\u201d He could (and from time to time seems to want to) lead his base to a different view. He could overcome his own addiction to NRA values: he could propose a plan of gun and ammunition control, background checks, and mental health care. If he were to propose the \u201cTrump Child Protection Plan,\u201d he would provide cover for the Republican legislators. They could find \u201cthe courage\u201d to follow his lead.<\/p>\n Trump could go to China. It could be his legacy. It might be the only positive that he can leave.<\/p>\n